2011-01-02

Estonia's Entry Expands Euro Into Former Soviet Union

Estonia entered the euro area with "no glitches" in banking and retail, shrugging off the sovereign debt crisis rippling through Europe to extend the currency block into the former Soviet Union.

Wedged between Russia and Latvia on the Baltic Sea, Estonia is the 17th country to switch to the currency. Gross domestic product of 14 billion euros ($19 billion) makes it the second- smallest euro economy after Malta.

"The New Year came exactly like the Estonian central bank and its partners had planned," deputy central bank Governor Rein Minka told a news conference in Tallinn, the capital, today. "There were no glitches with adopting the euro or with technical systems. The new money reached all the places it was supposed to."

As Europe grapples with the financial crisis, Estonia may be the last addition to the euro club for several years. Lithuania and Latvia, the next in line, aim to adopt the currency in 2014, while bigger eastern countries have shied away from setting target dates.

"For Estonia, the choice is to be inside the club, among the decision makers, or stay outside of the club," Prime Minister Andrus Ansip told reporters yesterday in Tallinn, the nation's capital. "We prefer to act as club members."

'Successfully Introduced'

The euro "has been successfully introduced in Estonia," the European Central Bank said in a statement on its website today.

Automated teller machines and card payments at Estonia's four largest banks, which account for more than 90 percent of the market, are working "smoothly", the Estonian central bank and Finance Ministry said in a statement distributed before news conference at 1 p.m. local time.

"It seems the Estonian society is taking to currency changeover calmly," Riho Unt, the head of the Estonian Banking Association and the chief executive officer of the Estonian unit of Stockholm-based SEB AB, said at the news conference. "There were no queues when we opened offices today. Only about 10,000 transactions have been made at the ATM's, which is very little, and less than 0.5 percent of euro cash has been withdrawn from teller machines."

Estonia, with debt estimated by the European Union at 8 percent of GDP for 2010, will be the nation with the most sound fiscal position in a currency bloc plagued by budget woes that forced Greece and Ireland to seek European and International Monetary Fund aid.

'Difficult Times'

"I hope other countries will notice that we met the euro- entry terms despite difficult times and this will improve Estonia's reputation," student Kaspar Nuut, 24, said yesterday in central Tallinn, as crowds gathered for the celebrations featuring a midnight fireworks display. "We would have had to adopt the euro anyway, so better sooner rather than later."

Estonia's central bank chief, Andres Lipstok, 53, will join the European Central Bank's policy-setting council, taking part in his first interest-rate vote on Jan. 13 in Frankfurt.

Some 85 million euro coins featuring a map of Estonia and 12 million bank notes went into circulation today, according to the central bank, starting a two-week phasing out of the national currency, the kroon. One euro buys 15.6466 krooni.

"I definitely support euro adoption as it will make traveling easier when all of Europe has the same currency," Ivi Normet, a 45-year-old civil servant, said. "I hope it will also benefit other aspects of life in Estonia."

Western Anchor

The 1.3 million Estonians have little experience of monetary autonomy. In June 1992, less than a year after gaining independence from the Soviet Union, Estonia shifted from the Russian ruble to a national currency that it immediately pegged to the German mark. The exchange rate was locked to the euro when the first 11 countries began using it in 1999.

Estonia in 2004 was in the initial wave of eastern European countries to join the EU, seeking a western anchor as an insurance policy against Russia.

"Estonia's entry means that over 330 million Europeans now carry euro notes and coins in their pockets," European Commission President Jose Barroso said yesterday in a statement. "It is a strong signal of the attraction and stability that the euro brings."

Economic growth averaged 7.2 percent between 1995 and the onset of the global financial crisis in 2007. Reliant on foreign investment, Estonia was hit harder than most in the global slump, with the economy shrinking 5.1 percent in 2008 and 13.9 percent in 2009, the sharpest contraction since its transition to a market economy at the beginning of 1990s.

Targets

Estonia's path to adopting the currency was marred by high inflation. Consumer prices soared 10.6 percent in 2008, missing one of the five economic tests for euro entry. The other targets are for deficits, debt, long-term interest rates and exchange- rate stability.

While the deficit, at 2.8 percent of GDP in 2008, was under the euro's 3 percent limit, the government kept up the austerity drive. Tax increases, spending cuts and higher dividend collection from state-owned companies whittled the shortfall to an estimated 1 percent in 2010.

Unlike in Latvia or Lithuania, Estonia's neighbors along the Baltic coast, the belt-tightening didn't provoke public unrest. Growth rebounded to 2.4 percent in 2010 and will reach 4.4 percent next year, the EU predicts.

Euro Support

"The Estonian government early in the crisis realized that it provides a great window of opportunity," said Andres Kasekamp, a politics professor at Tartu University. "The austerity and cuts in the public sector were necessary anyhow, but to make it more palatable, the government created a vision that these cuts are in the name of joining the euro."

Backing for the euro ebbed to 52 percent in December from a record 54 percent in November, according to a government- sponsored poll of 501 people with a margin of error of 4 percent. The decline, stemming from concerns over sovereign debt crisis and nostalgia for the soon-to-be abolished kroon, was still "surprisingly small," Tea Varrak, the chancellor of the Finance Ministry, said at the news conference today.

By contrast, support for the single currency is plunging in Germany, which designed the euro as the successor to the deutsche mark. Some 49 percent of Germans want to bring back the mark and 41 percent want to keep the euro, according to a Bild newspaper poll last month.

"This really is a coin with two sides," said Tiiu Braman, a 65-year-old pensioner in Tallinn. "Of course the kroon is very important to us historically and beautiful and so on, but we probably can't make it without the euro. Still, everyday life will be a bit more complicated for a while."

To contact the reporter on this story: Ott Ummelas in Tallinn at oummelas@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Willy Morris at wmorris@bloomberg.net

via

US most vulnerable to climate change among world's wealthy nations

Jeremy Hance

While the US has done little to mitigate climate change, a new report by humanitarian research organization DARA and the Climate Vulnerable Forum states that of all industrialized nations the US will face the most harm from a warming world. Together with Spain, the US's vulnerability to climate change has been listed as High by the newly releasedClimate Vulnerability Monitor

"Whilst it is the poorest, most vulnerable nations on earth that will bear the brunt of the climate crisis, the industrialized world is not immune from its impact either. Countries such as the United States will suffer the greatest economic losses from climate change so it is clearly in their own interest to act now to address these impacts, and to mitigate climate change," said DARA Trustee and adviser to the report, José María Figueres, in a press release. Figueres is also a former President of Costa Rica. 

According to the report, climate change impacts will cost the US around 40 billion dollars a year by 2030, more than any other nation in the world. 

The US is particularly sensitive to desertification, rising sea levels, and extreme weather. (via)

America's health reform A waste of breath

IT IS tempting to dismiss the bipartisan health-reform summit convened by Barack Obama on Thursday February 25th as a colossal waste of time. After all, the gabfest involving senior Congressional leaders from both parties lasted well over six hours, with no tangible results. Neither side moved one jot on any issue of substance and not one vote is likely to have changed on either side as a result of the summit.
And yet, the televised gathering was not pointless. For one thing, the sight of America's leading politicians sitting together amiably for an entire day to discuss a matter as inflammatory as health reform (think "death panels") was itself heartening. Surprisingly, given the bitter partisan wrangling of late, they did so in a manner that was mostly civil and substantive. Towards the end of the long day, Joe Barton, a House Republican from Texas, even declared that he had never seen "so many members of the House and Senate behave so well for so long before so many television cameras."
From the Republican point of view, the event accomplished two important things. First, Mr Obama was unable to outwit and outcharm them on camera, as he had done brilliantly during a televised exchange with House Republicans in late January. Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, their stridently partisan leaders in the Senate and the House, wisely allowed other Republicans —more charismatic and competent, it must be noted—to do most of the talking. That allowed them to say no to Mr Obama's plans without appearing, as is often the accusation with Republicans, merely the "Party of No". Mr McConnell even admitted afterwards that "I would not call it a waste of time."

The event went less well for Mr Obama. After a year of dithering, he unveiled his own grand plan for reforming health care on the eve of the summit. This scheme closely resembles a health-reform bill passed by the Senate just before Christmas (the House passed a substantially different version earlier, and the two bills now need to be reconciled into a final health law). The big question before the summit was whether Mr Obama would really be open to modifying his plan to embrace Republican ideas, or whether the event was merely a sham.
In the event, Mr Obama appeared to make some progress on bipartisanship. He listened intently to Republican ideas—except the oft-repeated one to scrap Democratic efforts and just "start over"—and was often seen scribbling notes. At the end of the summit, he reviewed a number of areas where he believed the two parties had similar goals, and he asked the Republicans to think of ways to bridge the divide on them. Among those ripe for co-operation, he declared, were tort reform, inter-state competition in health insurance, the creation of insurance exchanges and tackling fraud in Medicare (a government health scheme for the elderly).
This is not likely to herald the start of a new, incremental and heart-warmingly bipartisan approach to health reform, however. For one thing, Republicans made it clear that they are not willing to do anything to help Mr Obama pass health reform quickly. Mr Obama, for his part, made plain that he was willing to entertain Republican notions only as add-ons to his existing bill, not as an entirely new approach.
Rumours swirled during the summit that if Mr Obama's big plan (which aims to extend health insurance to some 30m uninsured punters) fails to pass, he may then put forward a less ambitious scheme covering only half that number. But Kathleen Sebelius, the administration's health secretary, denied this after the summit. Mr Obama himself rejected the incremental approach. He insisted, with some justification, that "baby steps" will not work because the pieces of the health-reform puzzle are tightly interlinked.
If so, that leaves Mr Obama with only one course of action: to push through some version of his health plan without Republican votes. It will be very difficult with only Democratic votes, given that moderates and progressives in his own caucus have misgivings. Ramming a sweeping health law through Congress on a highly partisan basis using procedural wheezes, Republicans repeatedly warned, will prove unpopular. Despite those obstacles, though, Mr Obama now seems ready for battle.
That points to the biggest reason to think the summit was not a waste of time: it made clear that Mr Obama, after months of sitting on the sidelines, now has steel in his spine. If Republicans do not come up with a reasonable set of compromise measures over the next few weeks to add to his plan, he says that he intends to forge ahead anyway. The final verdict, he insisted, will come from the voters: "We've got to go ahead and make some decisions, and then that's what elections are for."

2010-12-28

RIM thought iPhone was impossible in 2007 | Electronista

 
 

Sent to you by forcode via Google Reader:

 
 

via www.electronista.com on 12/28/10

RIM had a complete internal panic when Apple unveiled the iPhone in 2007, a former employee revealed this weekend. The BlackBerry maker is now known to have held multiple all-hands meetings on January 10 that year, a day after the iPhone was on stage, and to have made outlandish claims about its features. Apple was effectively accused of lying as it was supposedly impossible that a device could have such a large touchscreen but still get a usable lifespan away from a power outlet.

The iPhone "couldn't do what [Apple was] demonstrating without an insanely power hungry processor, it must have terrible battery life," Shacknews poster Kentor heard from his former colleagues of the time. "Imagine their surprise [at RIM] when they disassembled an iPhone for the first time and found that the phone was battery with a tiny logic board strapped to it."

Friends who were Microsoft employees at the time were also said to have had a similar reaction.

He further added that RIM, as well as Motorola, Nokia, Palm and other early pioneers, lost ground partly because of a self-defeating attitude. RIM in particular assumed from the start that smartphones would be outgrowths of its pagers and that there would never be enough battery life or wireless technology for more functions. It started growing beyond this view before the iPhone shipped, but the OS foundation until recently was based on the early assumption.

The remarks confirm a widely held belief that BlackBerry Storm development started only after the iPhone was made public rather than having been in development at all before. RIM didn't have its first touchscreen phone until the Storm shipped in late 2008, almost two years after the iPhone's unveiling, and didn't have multi-touch support or a fully accurate web browser until the Torch arrived just this past summer. Apple is now gradually overtaking RIM in market share and is being quickly joined by Android, which now makes up the majority of Verizon sales just a year after the BlackBerry was the carrier's top earner.

RIM may be poised for a comeback as it has promised an aggressive 2011 roadmap, but virtually all of what it will do outside of the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet is a mystery.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Zynga’s CityVille Now More Than 25 Percent Bigger Than FarmVille

 
 

Sent to you by forcode via Google Reader:

 
 

via TechCrunch by Robin Wauters on 12/28/10

We knew Zynga's Facebook game CityVille was a hit if the company ever had one (and it's had several already) but the growth that it is displaying is simply mind-blowing.

We'll kick off by pointing out that the game was released on December 2, 2010, which is less than a month ago.

The company subsequently reported that in the game's first 24 hours on Facebook, over 290,000 people had already played CityVille. A few days later: 3 million daily active users. And while you turned your eyes away from the screen for a few minutes: bang, 6 million active users.

Last week, the Sim City-esque game logged about 61.7 million monthly active users, effectively eclipsing its other hit game, FarmVille. Today, CityVille is at close to 72.5 million monthly active users, which means that it has already outgrown FarmVille (which boasts roughly 57,4 million monthly active users) by more than 25 percent.

CityVille isn't just the biggest game on Facebook, it's now the biggest game on Facebook with one hell of a margin.

For the record: we got the number straight from the application pages, as AppData's stats on monthly active users appear to be a tad outdated at the time of writing.

And just for the heck of it, here are the current usage stats for the other "Ville" games:

FrontierVille: 30,468,070 monthly active users
PetVille: 8,394,142 monthly active users
YoVille: 6,232,611 monthly active users
FishVille: 4,969,283 monthly active users

No wonder Google investor John Doerr famously said Zynga is probably his VC firm's best investment to date. Its growth is simply astounding.



 
 

Things you can do from here: